Evaluating the achievements and impacts of EC framework programme transport projects

Tuominen, Annu and Järvi, Tuuli and Hyytinen, Kirsi and Mitsakis, Evangelos and López Lambas, María Eugenia and La Paix Puello, Lissy Cesarina and Van Der Waard, Jan and Binsted, Anne and Sitov, Anatolij (2011). Evaluating the achievements and impacts of EC framework programme transport projects. "European Transport Research Review (ETRR)", v. 2011 (n. 3); pp. 59-74. ISSN 0013-2845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0048-3.

Description

Title: Evaluating the achievements and impacts of EC framework programme transport projects
Author/s:
  • Tuominen, Annu
  • Järvi, Tuuli
  • Hyytinen, Kirsi
  • Mitsakis, Evangelos
  • López Lambas, María Eugenia
  • La Paix Puello, Lissy Cesarina
  • Van Der Waard, Jan
  • Binsted, Anne
  • Sitov, Anatolij
Item Type: Article
Título de Revista/Publicación: European Transport Research Review (ETRR)
Date: July 2011
ISSN: 0013-2845
Volume: 2011
Subjects:
Faculty: E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM)
Department: Ingeniería Civil: Transportes [hasta 2014]
Creative Commons Licenses: Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial

Full text

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (510kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present what kind of elements and evaluation methods should be included into a framework for evaluating the achievements and impacts of transport projects supported in EC Framework Programmes (FP). Further, the paper discusses the possibilities of such an evaluation framework in producing recommendations regarding future transport research and policy objectives as well as mutual learning for the basis of strategic long term planning. Methods The paper describes the two-dimensional evaluation methodology developed in the course of the FP7 METRONOME project. The dimensions are: (1) achievement of project objectives and targets in different levels and (2) research project impacts according to four impact groups. The methodology uses four complementary approaches in evaluation, namely evaluation matrices, coordinator questionnaires, lead user interviews and workshops. Results Based on the methodology testing, with a sample of FP5 and FP6 projects, the main results relating to the rationale, implementation and achievements of FP projects is presented. In general, achievement of objectives in both FPs was good. Strongest impacts were identified within the impact group of management and co-ordination. Also scientific and end-user impacts of the projects were adequate, but wider societal impacts quite modest. The paper concludes with a discussion both on the theoretical and practical implications of the proposed methodology and by presenting some relevant future research needs.

More information

Item ID: 11626
DC Identifier: http://oa.upm.es/11626/
OAI Identifier: oai:oa.upm.es:11626
DOI: 10.1007/s12544-011-0048-3
Official URL: http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12544-011-0048-3
Deposited by: Memoria Investigacion
Deposited on: 12 Jul 2012 11:05
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2018 18:03
  • Logo InvestigaM (UPM)
  • Logo GEOUP4
  • Logo Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Logo Sherpa/Romeo
    Check whether the anglo-saxon journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo Dulcinea
    Check whether the spanish journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo de Recolecta
  • Logo del Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • Logo de OpenCourseWare UPM