Counting Highly Cited Papers for University Research Assessment: Conceptual and Technical Issues

Rodriguez Navarro, Alonso (2012). Counting Highly Cited Papers for University Research Assessment: Conceptual and Technical Issues. "PLOS One", v. 7 (n. 10 e47); pp. 1-10. ISSN 1932-6203.

Descripción

Título: Counting Highly Cited Papers for University Research Assessment: Conceptual and Technical Issues
Autor/es:
  • Rodriguez Navarro, Alonso
Tipo de Documento: Artículo
Título de Revista/Publicación: PLOS One
Fecha: Octubre 2012
Volumen: 7
Materias:
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Departamento: Biotecnologia [hasta 2014]
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (565kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

A Kuhnian approach to research assessment requires us to consider that the important scientific breakthroughs that drive scientific progress are infrequent and that the progress of science does not depend on normal research. Consequently, indicators of research performance based on the total number of papers do not accurately measure scientific progress. Similarly, those universities with the best reputations in terms of scientific progress differ widely from other universities in terms of the scale of investments made in research and in the higher concentrations of outstanding scientists present, but less so in terms of the total number of papers or citations. This study argues that indicators for the 1% high-citation tail of the citation distribution reveal the contribution of universities to the progress of science and provide quantifiable justification for the large investments in research made by elite research universities. In this tail, which follows a power low, the number of the less frequent and highly cited important breakthroughs can be predicted from the frequencies of papers in the upper part of the tail. This study quantifies the false impression of excellence produced by multinational papers, and by other types of papers that do not contribute to the progress of science. Many of these papers are concentrated in and dominate lists of highly cited papers, especially in lower-ranked universities. The h-index obscures the differences between higher- and lower-ranked universities because the proportion of h-core papers in the 1% high-citation tail is not proportional to the value of the h-index.

Más información

ID de Registro: 16155
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/16155/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:16155
URL Oficial: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0047210
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 05 Jul 2013 13:09
Ultima Modificación: 21 Abr 2016 16:29
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM