Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results vs. prediction using non-linear static methods

Benavent Climent, Amadeo y Escolano Margarit, David (2012). Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results vs. prediction using non-linear static methods. "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering", v. 10 (n. 6); pp. 1857-1883. ISSN 1570-761X. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9375-6.

Descripción

Título: Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results vs. prediction using non-linear static methods
Autor/es:
  • Benavent Climent, Amadeo
  • Escolano Margarit, David
Tipo de Documento: Artículo
Título de Revista/Publicación: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Fecha: Diciembre 2012
Volumen: 10
Materias:
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Industriales (UPM)
Departamento: Mecánica Estructural y Construcciones Industriales [hasta 2014]
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (2MB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

The use of seismic hysteretic dampers for passive control is increasing exponentially in recent years for both new and existing buildings. In order to utilize hysteretic dampers within a structural system, it is of paramount importance to have simplified design procedures based upon knowledge gained from theoretical studies and validated with experimental results. Non-linear Static Procedures (NSPs) are presented as an alternative to the force-based methods more common nowadays. The application of NSPs to conventional structures has been well established; yet there is a lack of experimental information on how NSPs apply to systems with hysteretic dampers. In this research, several shaking table tests were conducted on two single bay and single story 1:2 scale structures with and without hysteretic dampers. The maximum response of the structure with dampers in terms of lateral displacement and base shear obtained from the tests was compared with the prediction provided by three well-known NSPs: (1) the improved version of the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) from FEMA 440; (2) the improved version of the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) from FEMA 440; and (3) the N2 Method implemented in Eurocode 8. In general, the improved version of the DCM and N2 methods are found to provide acceptable accuracy in prediction, but the CSM tends to underestimate the response.

Más información

ID de Registro: 16212
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/16212/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:16212
Identificador DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9375-6
URL Oficial: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10518-012-9375-6
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 18 Ene 2014 14:21
Ultima Modificación: 28 Jun 2016 07:12
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM