Cover crops effect on farm benefits and nitrate leaching: Linking economic and environmental analysis.

Gabriel Pérez, José Luis and Garrido Colmenero, Alberto and Quemada Saenz-Badillos, Miguel (2013). Cover crops effect on farm benefits and nitrate leaching: Linking economic and environmental analysis.. "Agricultural Systems", v. 121 ; pp. 23-32. ISSN 0308-521X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.06.0.

Description

Title: Cover crops effect on farm benefits and nitrate leaching: Linking economic and environmental analysis.
Author/s:
  • Gabriel Pérez, José Luis
  • Garrido Colmenero, Alberto
  • Quemada Saenz-Badillos, Miguel
Item Type: Article
Título de Revista/Publicación: Agricultural Systems
Date: October 2013
ISSN: 0308-521X
Volume: 121
Subjects:
Faculty: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Department: Economía y Ciencias Sociales Agrarias [hasta 2014]
Creative Commons Licenses: Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial

Full text

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (10MB)

Abstract

Introducing cover crops (CC) interspersed with intensively fertilized crops in rotation has the potential to reduce nitrate leaching. This paper evaluates various strategies involving CC between maize and compares the economic and environmental results with respect to a typical maize?fallow rotation. The comparison is performed through stochastic (Monte-Carlo) simulation models of farms? profits using probability distribution functions (pdfs) of yield and N fertilizer saving fitted with data collected from various field trials and pdfs of crop prices and the cost of fertilizer fitted from statistical sources. Stochastic dominance relationships are obtained to rank the most profitable strategies from a farm financial perspective. A two-criterion comparison scheme is proposed to rank alternative strategies based on farm profit and nitrate leaching levels, taking the baseline scenario as the maize?fallow rotation. The results show that when CC biomass is sold as forage instead of keeping it in the soil, greater profit and less leaching of nitrates are achieved than in the baseline scenario. While the fertilizer saving will be lower if CC is sold than if it is kept in the soil, the revenue obtained from the sale of the CC compensates for the reduced fertilizer savings. The results show that CC would perhaps provide a double dividend of greater profit and reduced nitrate leaching in intensive irrigated cropping systems in Mediterranean regions.

More information

Item ID: 28874
DC Identifier: http://oa.upm.es/28874/
OAI Identifier: oai:oa.upm.es:28874
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.06.0
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X13000747
Deposited by: Memoria Investigacion
Deposited on: 24 Jun 2014 13:37
Last Modified: 01 Nov 2015 23:56
  • Logo InvestigaM (UPM)
  • Logo GEOUP4
  • Logo Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Logo Sherpa/Romeo
    Check whether the anglo-saxon journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo Dulcinea
    Check whether the spanish journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo de Recolecta
  • Logo del Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • Logo de OpenCourseWare UPM