Towards mitigation of greenhouse gases by small changes in farming practices: understanding local barriers in Spain.

Sánchez, Berta and Álvaro Fuentes, Jorge and Ann Cunningham, Ruth and Iglesias Picazo, Ana (2014). Towards mitigation of greenhouse gases by small changes in farming practices: understanding local barriers in Spain.. "Mitigation And Adaptation Strategies For Global Change", v. 4 (n. 4); pp. 1-34. ISSN 1381-2386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9562-7.

Description

Title: Towards mitigation of greenhouse gases by small changes in farming practices: understanding local barriers in Spain.
Author/s:
  • Sánchez, Berta
  • Álvaro Fuentes, Jorge
  • Ann Cunningham, Ruth
  • Iglesias Picazo, Ana
Item Type: Article
Título de Revista/Publicación: Mitigation And Adaptation Strategies For Global Change
Date: April 2014
ISSN: 1381-2386
Volume: 4
Subjects:
Faculty: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Department: Economía Agraria, Estadística y Gestión de Empresas
Creative Commons Licenses: Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial

Full text

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (773kB) | Preview

Abstract

Small changes in agricultural practices have a large potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the implementation of such practices at the local level is often limited by a range of barriers. Understanding the barriers is essential for defining effective measures, the actual mitigation potential of the measures, and the policy needs to ensure implementation. Here we evaluate behavioural, cultural, and policy barriers for implementation of mitigation practices at the local level that imply small changes to farmers. The choice of potential mitigation practices relevant to the case study is based on a literature review of previous empirical studies. Two methods that include the stakeholders? involvement (experts and farmers) are undertaken for the prioritization of these potential practices: (a) Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) of the choices of an expert panel and (b) Analysis of barriers to implementation based on a survey of farmers. The MCA considers two future climate scenarios ? current climate and a drier and warmer climate scenario. Results suggest that all potential selected practices are suitable for mitigation considering multiple criteria in both scenarios. Nevertheless, if all the barriers for implementation had the same influence, the preferred mitigation practices in the case study would be changes in fertilization management and use of cover crops. The identification of barriers for the implementation of the practices is based on the econometric analysis of surveys given to farmers. Results show that farmers? environmental concerns, financial incentives and access to technical advice are the main factors that define their barriers to implementation. These results may contribute to develop effective mitigation policy to be included in the 2020 review of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy.

More information

Item ID: 35860
DC Identifier: http://oa.upm.es/35860/
OAI Identifier: oai:oa.upm.es:35860
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-014-9562-7
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-014-9562-7
Deposited by: Memoria Investigacion
Deposited on: 01 Jul 2015 16:39
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2015 16:39
  • Logo InvestigaM (UPM)
  • Logo GEOUP4
  • Logo Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Logo Sherpa/Romeo
    Check whether the anglo-saxon journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo Dulcinea
    Check whether the spanish journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo de Recolecta
  • Logo del Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • Logo de OpenCourseWare UPM