An Integrated Transport Planning Framework Involving a Combined Utility-Regret Approach

Wang, Yang; Monzón de Cáceres, Andrés; Ciommo, Floridea di y Kaplan, Sigal (2014). An Integrated Transport Planning Framework Involving a Combined Utility-Regret Approach. "Transportation Research Record", v. 2429 ; pp. 59-66. ISSN 0361-1981. https://doi.org/10.3141/2429-07.

Descripción

Título: An Integrated Transport Planning Framework Involving a Combined Utility-Regret Approach
Autor/es:
  • Wang, Yang
  • Monzón de Cáceres, Andrés
  • Ciommo, Floridea di
  • Kaplan, Sigal
Tipo de Documento: Artículo
Título de Revista/Publicación: Transportation Research Record
Fecha: 2014
Volumen: 2429
Materias:
Escuela: Centro de Investigación del Transporte (TRANSyT) (UPM)
Departamento: Ingeniería Civil: Transporte y Territorio
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (224kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

Sustainable transport planning requires an integrated approach involving strategic planning, impact analysis, and multicriteria evaluation. This study aimed at relaxing the utility-based decision-making assumption by newly embedding anticipated-regret and combined utility regret decision mechanisms in a framework for integrated transport planning. The framework consisted of a two-round Delphi survey, integrated land use and transport model for Madrid, and multicriteria analysis. Results show that (a) the regret-based ranking has a similar mean but larger variance than the utility-based ranking does, (b) the least-regret scenario forms a compromise between the desired and the expected scenarios, (c) the least-regret scenario can lead to higher user benefits in the short term and lower user benefits in the long term, (d) the utility-based, the regret-based, and the combined utility- and regret-based multicriteria analyses result in different rankings of policy packages, and (e) the combined utility regret ranking is more informative compared with the utility-based or the regret-based ranking.

Más información

ID de Registro: 35864
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/35864/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:35864
Identificador DOI: 10.3141/2429-07
URL Oficial: http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/doi/abs/10.3141/2429-07
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 25 May 2017 10:59
Ultima Modificación: 25 May 2017 10:59
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM