Selecting crop models for decision making in wheat insurance

Castañeda Vera, Alba; Leffelaar, P. A.; Álvaro Fuentes, Jorge; Cantero Martínez, C. y Mínguez, M. I. (2015). Selecting crop models for decision making in wheat insurance. "European Journal of Agronomy" (n. 68); pp. 97-116. ISSN 1161-0301.

Descripción

Título: Selecting crop models for decision making in wheat insurance
Autor/es:
  • Castañeda Vera, Alba
  • Leffelaar, P. A.
  • Álvaro Fuentes, Jorge
  • Cantero Martínez, C.
  • Mínguez, M. I.
Tipo de Documento: Artículo
Título de Revista/Publicación: European Journal of Agronomy
Fecha: Agosto 2015
Materias:
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Departamento: Economía Agraria, Estadística y Gestión de Empresas
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img] Pdf - Acceso permitido solamente a usuarios en el campus de la UPM hasta 31 Agosto 2017 - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (19MB)

Resumen

In crop insurance, the accuracy with which the insurer quantifies the actual risk is highly dependent on the availability on actual yield data. Crop models might be valuable tools to generate data on expected yields for risk assessment when no historical records are available. However, selecting a crop model for a specific objective, location and implementation scale is a difficult task. A look inside the different crop and soil modules to understand how outputs are obtained might facilitate model choice. The objectives of this paper were (i) to assess the usefulness of crop models to be used within a crop insurance analysis and design and (ii) to select the most suitable crop model for drought risk assessment in semi-arid regions in Spain. For that purpose first, a pre-selection of crop models simulating wheat yield under rainfed growing conditions at the field scale was made, and second, four selected models (Aquacrop, CERES- Wheat, CropSyst and WOFOST) were compared in terms of modelling approaches, process descriptions and model outputs. Outputs of the four models for the simulation of winter wheat growth are comparable when water is not limiting, but differences are larger when simulating yields under rainfed conditions. These differences in rainfed yields are mainly related to the dissimilar simulated soil water availability and the assumed linkages with dry matter formation. We concluded that for the simulation of winter wheat growth at field scale in such semi-arid conditions, CERES-Wheat and CropSyst are preferred. WOFOST is a satisfactory compromise between data availability and complexity when detail data on soil is limited. Aquacrop integrates physiological processes in some representative parameters, thus diminishing the number of input parameters, what is seen as an advantage when observed data is scarce. However, the high sensitivity of this model to low water availability limits its use in the region considered. Contrary to the use of ensembles of crop models, we endorse that efforts be concentrated on selecting or rebuilding a model that includes approaches that better describe the agronomic conditions of the regions in which they will be applied. The use of such complex methodologies as crop models is associated with numerous sources of uncertainty, although these models are the best tools available to get insight in these complex agronomic systems.

Proyectos asociados

TipoCódigoAcrónimoResponsableTítulo
Gobierno de EspañaCGL2012-38923-C02-02Sin especificarSin especificarSin especificar

Más información

ID de Registro: 38432
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/38432/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:38432
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 11 Dic 2015 15:54
Ultima Modificación: 11 Dic 2015 15:54
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM