Understading the food security governance in Latin America. Analysis to strengthen planning and cooperation

Moncayo Miño, Marco Vinicio; Yagüe Blanco, José Luis y Ramírez Fiora, Alberto (2016). Understading the food security governance in Latin America. Analysis to strengthen planning and cooperation. En: "20th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering", 13/07/2016-15/07/2016, Cartagena, España. p. 11.

Descripción

Título: Understading the food security governance in Latin America. Analysis to strengthen planning and cooperation
Autor/es:
  • Moncayo Miño, Marco Vinicio
  • Yagüe Blanco, José Luis
  • Ramírez Fiora, Alberto
Tipo de Documento: Ponencia en Congreso o Jornada (Artículo)
Título del Evento: 20th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering
Fechas del Evento: 13/07/2016-15/07/2016
Lugar del Evento: Cartagena, España
Título del Libro: 20th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering
Fecha: 2016
Materias:
Escuela: E.T.S. de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (UPM)
Departamento: Ingeniería Agroforestal
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (1MB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

2015 was the year agreed to measure the accomplishment of the global goals related to hunger. According to international data, Latin America - LA achieved these goals. This result could be explained, in part, by regulatory development to address food insecurity. Although the regional results, as a whole, are positive; there are some differences at the national level. The reasons why some countries did not take the same way as others, in spite of having strengthened its legal and institutional frameworks, must be a call for reflection. The aim of this research is to understand the governance models that promoted the food security laws in LA, to facilitate project?s design and its implementation. Analyzing the institutional behavior during the public policy cycle, 3 models were differed: first, civil society presents high organization and governmental actors share responsibility in prioritization and development of initiatives; second, government actors seek to assume most responsibilities creating new spaces of joint work at different territorial levels; and third, governmental actors feels capable of assuming most responsibilities using the traditional government structure.

Más información

ID de Registro: 46623
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/46623/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:46623
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 27 Jun 2017 14:51
Ultima Modificación: 27 Jun 2017 14:51
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM