Methods for Evaluating Social Vulnerability to Drought

Iglesias Picazo, Ana; Moneo Laín, Marta y Quiroga Gomez, Sonia (2008). Methods for Evaluating Social Vulnerability to Drought. En: "Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems Drought Management and Policy Development in the Mediterranean". Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, 26 . Springer, CIHEAM, London, UK., pp. 153-160. ISBN 978-1-4020-9044-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_11.

Descripción

Título: Methods for Evaluating Social Vulnerability to Drought
Autor/es:
  • Iglesias Picazo, Ana
  • Moneo Laín, Marta
  • Quiroga Gomez, Sonia
Tipo de Documento: Sección de Libro
Título del Libro: Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems Drought Management and Policy Development in the Mediterranean
Fecha: 2008
ISBN: 978-1-4020-9044-8
Volumen: 26
Materias:
Palabras Clave Informales: risk, cause, socio-economic, environmental, vulnerability index.
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Departamento: Economía y Ciencias Sociales Agrarias [hasta 2014]
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (466kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

Social vulnerability to drought is complex and it is reflected by society’s capacity to anticipate, cope with and respond. Here we estimate these aspects of social vulnerability, evaluating the natural resource structure, the economic capacity, the human and civic resources, and aspects of agricultural innovation. These factors are components of a vulnerability index and they can be weighted appropriately in computing the final value of the index. In this chapter we present the results of the index under two valuation scenarios. For Scenario 1 all components are valued equally. For Scenario 2 the human resources component is given 50% of the weight, the economic and natural resource components are given 20% of the weight each, and the agricultural technology is given 10% of the weight. This reflects the assumption that a society with institutional capacity and coordination and mechanisms for public participation is less vulnerable to drought and that agriculture is only one of the sectors affected by drought. The vulnerability index establishes robust conclusions since the range of values across countries does not change with the assumptions under the two scenarios.

Más información

ID de Registro: 4946
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/4946/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:4946
Identificador DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_11
URL Oficial: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r81r831006287114/
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 19 Nov 2010 12:03
Ultima Modificación: 20 Abr 2016 13:57
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM