The Changing Decision-Making Narratives in 25 Years of TEN-T Policies

Aparicio Mourelo, Ángel Carlos (2017). The Changing Decision-Making Narratives in 25 Years of TEN-T Policies. En: "World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR 2016", 10-15 July 2016, Shanghai. pp. 3715-3724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.223.

Descripción

Título: The Changing Decision-Making Narratives in 25 Years of TEN-T Policies
Autor/es:
  • Aparicio Mourelo, Ángel Carlos
Tipo de Documento: Ponencia en Congreso o Jornada (Artículo)
Título del Evento: World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR 2016
Fechas del Evento: 10-15 July 2016
Lugar del Evento: Shanghai
Título del Libro: Transportation Research Procedia
Fecha: 2017
Volumen: 25
Materias:
Palabras Clave Informales: TEN-T, Planning, Decision-Making, Transport Policy Research
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM)
Departamento: Ingeniería Civil: Transporte y Territorio
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (437kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

This paper reviews changes in the role and practice of planners in the last 25 years of European policy on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T)., aiming at describing the role of technicians in the decision-making process, and their contribution to the consolidation of collaborative and transparent planning practices. The review highlights the driving forces that have use technical considerations to merely create a self-justifying narrative of a process dominated by the institutional stakeholders. The key aspects examined include (1) the respective roles of institutional decision makers (at EU and national levels), other stakeholders and the public; (2) the technical tools mobilized in the process; and (4) the evolution of the prevailing narratives, their rationale, the factual evidence behind them, and their capacity to build up consensus and to empower or to alienate key stakeholders. The TEN-T process was effectively captured by a coalition of EC and national transport services, as a means to claim more resources for transport infrastructure expansion. The coalition was backed by most of the transport stakeholders, in spite of some minor criticisms (on modal distribution?.), as a way to get access to public funding. The academic criticism has not resulted in any changes (although has produced some self-justifying reports from the EC); legal and institutional "windows" to strengthen the planning process have not resulted in more collaborative practices or enhanced review practices.

Más información

ID de Registro: 50068
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/50068/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:50068
Identificador DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.223
URL Oficial: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146517305240
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 12 Abr 2018 14:52
Ultima Modificación: 17 Abr 2018 16:27
  • GEO_UP4
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • InvestigaM
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM