Full text
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Mendoza, M.A. and Garcia Rubiano, Jesus and Gil, J.M. and Rodríguez, Rafael and Florido, Ricardo and Martel, Pablo and Mínguez Torres, Emilio (2011). A new set of relativistic screening constants for the screened hydrogenic model. "High Energy Density Physics", v. 7 (n. 3); pp. 169-179. ISSN 1574-1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hedp.2011.04.006.
Title: | A new set of relativistic screening constants for the screened hydrogenic model |
---|---|
Author/s: |
|
Item Type: | Article |
Título de Revista/Publicación: | High Energy Density Physics |
Date: | September 2011 |
ISSN: | 1574-1818 |
Volume: | 7 |
Subjects: | |
Faculty: | E.T.S.I. Industriales (UPM) |
Department: | Ingeniería Nuclear [hasta 2014] |
Creative Commons Licenses: | Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial |
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview |
AnewRelativisticScreenedHydrogenicModel has been developed to calculate atomic data needed to compute the optical and thermodynamic properties of high energy density plasmas. The model is based on anewset of universal screeningconstants, including nlj-splitting that has been obtained by fitting to a large database of ionization potentials and excitation energies. This database was built with energies compiled from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database of experimental atomic energy levels, and energies calculated with the Flexible Atomic Code (FAC). The screeningconstants have been computed up to the 5p3/2 subshell using a Genetic Algorithm technique with an objective function designed to minimize both the relative error and the maximum error. To select the best set of screeningconstants some additional physical criteria has been applied, which are based on the reproduction of the filling order of the shells and on obtaining the best ground state configuration. A statistical error analysis has been performed to test the model, which indicated that approximately 88% of the data lie within a ±10% error interval. We validate the model by comparing the results with ionization energies, transition energies, and wave functions computed using sophisticated self-consistent codes and experimental data.
Item ID: | 11165 |
---|---|
DC Identifier: | https://oa.upm.es/11165/ |
OAI Identifier: | oai:oa.upm.es:11165 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hedp.2011.04.006 |
Deposited by: | Memoria Investigacion |
Deposited on: | 26 Jun 2012 09:54 |
Last Modified: | 20 Apr 2016 19:19 |