Full text
![]() |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (119kB) |
Sevilla Buitrago, Álvaro ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-4265
(2017).
Gramsci and Foucault in Central Park: Environmental hegemonies, pedagogical spaces and integral state formations.
"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space", v. 35
(n. 1);
pp. 165-183.
ISSN 0263-7758.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658293.
Title: | Gramsci and Foucault in Central Park: Environmental hegemonies, pedagogical spaces and integral state formations |
---|---|
Author/s: |
|
Item Type: | Article |
Título de Revista/Publicación: | Environment and Planning D: Society and Space |
Date: | 2017 |
ISSN: | 0263-7758 |
Volume: | 35 |
Subjects: | |
Freetext Keywords: | Antonio Gramsci, Michel Foucault, Central Park, environmental hegemony, landscape architecture, integral state |
Faculty: | E.T.S. Arquitectura (UPM) |
Department: | Urbanística y Ordenación del Territorio |
UPM's Research Group: | Investigación en Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Sostenibilidad GIAU+S |
Creative Commons Licenses: | None |
This is the latest version for this electronic publication.
![]() |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (119kB) |
Gramsci’s and Foucault’s readings of power provide critical illuminations for understanding the linkage of state formations to urbanization and the spatial production of subjectivity. This article uses Central Park to illustrate how a combination of their insights helps to elucidate the emergence of pedagogical spaces and environmental hegemonies. I first propose a conceptual framework drawing on diverse parallels and tensions in Gramsci’s Quaderni del carcere and Foucault’s investigations in the 1970s, reassessed here from the vantage point of the implicit debate with Marxism in La société punitive. Urbanization and the built environment are theorized as material apparatuses of a form of capillary power that reconfigures the relations between state, civil society and individual subjects, striving to forge common senses of space that buttress political hegemony. This analytical toolkit is then applied in a political reappraisal of Central Park, exploring the role of design in the pedagogy of subaltern spatialities and the normalization of a consensual regime of publicity. The discussion pays special attention to the park’s assemblage of liberal and disciplinary spatial techniques, its connection to broader agencies beyond core state apparatuses, and their effect on the advent of an integral state formation.
Item ID: | 45705 |
---|---|
DC Identifier: | https://oa.upm.es/45705/ |
OAI Identifier: | oai:oa.upm.es:45705 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0263775816658293 |
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658293 |
Deposited by: | Profesor Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago |
Deposited on: | 03 May 2017 12:29 |
Last Modified: | 01 May 2018 22:30 |