Full text
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (2MB) | Preview |
Zhao, Benzhong and MacMinn, Christopher W. and Primkulov, Bauyrzhan K. and Chen, Yu and Valocchi, Albert J. and Zhao, Jianlin and Kang, Qinjun and Bruning, Kelsey and McClure, James E. and Miller, Cass T. and Abbas, Fakhari and Bolster, Diogo and Hiller, Thomas and Brinkmann, Martin and Cueto-Felgueroso Landeira, Luis and Cogswell, Daniel A. and Verma, Rahul and Prodanovic, Masa and Maes, Julien and Geiger, Sebastian and Vassvik, Morten and Hansen, Alex and Segre, Enrico and Holtzman, Ran and Zhibing, Yang and Yuan, Chao and Chareyre, Bruno and Juanes, Rubén (2019). Comprehensive Comparison of Pore-Scale Models for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media. "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences", v. 116 (n. 28); pp. 13799-13806. ISSN 1091-6490. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116.
Title: | Comprehensive Comparison of Pore-Scale Models for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media |
---|---|
Author/s: |
|
Item Type: | Article |
Título de Revista/Publicación: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
Date: | 9 July 2019 |
ISSN: | 1091-6490 |
Volume: | 116 |
Subjects: | |
Freetext Keywords: | Porous Media, Capillarity, Wettability, Pattern Formation, Simulation |
Faculty: | E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM) |
Department: | Ingeniería Civil: Hidráulica, Energía y Medio Ambiente |
Creative Commons Licenses: | Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial |
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (2MB) | Preview |
Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.
Item ID: | 64058 |
---|---|
DC Identifier: | https://oa.upm.es/64058/ |
OAI Identifier: | oai:oa.upm.es:64058 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1901619116 |
Official URL: | https://www.pnas.org/content/116/28/13799 |
Deposited by: | Memoria Investigacion |
Deposited on: | 25 Sep 2020 12:16 |
Last Modified: | 25 Sep 2020 12:16 |