The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability

López Lambas, María Eugenia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-453X and Alonso Ramos, Andrea ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-8581 (2019). The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability. "Sustainability", v. 11 (n. 18); p. 4986. ISSN 2071-1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184986.

Description

Title: The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability
Author/s:
Item Type: Article
Título de Revista/Publicación: Sustainability
Date: 12 September 2019
ISSN: 2071-1050
Volume: 11
Subjects:
Freetext Keywords: Autonomous Vehicles, Driverless Buses, Acceptability, Focus Group, Barriers
Faculty: E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM)
Department: Ingeniería del Transporte, Territorio y Urbanismo
Creative Commons Licenses: Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial

Full text

[thumbnail of INVE_MEM_2019_326710.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) holds a high potential for improving security, reducing congestion, increasing fuel efficiency, and saving time. Various studies conducted on the implementation of AVs predict that fully autonomous vehicles will be available for the public in the 2020s. However, it will take another three decades, at least, for these vehicles and technologies to be accepted among the general masses and become reliable and affordable for use. Nonetheless, while a great deal has been stated regarding autonomous cars, little attention has been paid to autonomous public transport, more specifically, autonomous buses (ABs). The present report analyzed the psychological barriers preventing the complete implementation of ABs through data collected from focus group (FG) discussions. The main objective of the FGs was to determine the factors influencing perceptions regarding ABs and their acceptability. The most important factors from the positive side were the reduction of personnel costs, the potential to decrease congestion, waiting time at intersections, and reduced emissions. On the other hand, the most important negative factors were an increase in vehicle and infrastructure costs, safety risks under certain conditions (e.g., system failures, terrorist attacks, etc.), and the possible reduction of employment opportunities.

Funding Projects

Type
Code
Acronym
Leader
Title
Government of Spain
EXP 00093152/TIC-20160172
Unspecified
Unspecified
AUTOMOST: Guiado automatizado para sistema de transporte dual

More information

Item ID: 64444
DC Identifier: https://oa.upm.es/64444/
OAI Identifier: oai:oa.upm.es:64444
DOI: 10.3390/su11184986
Official URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4986
Deposited by: Memoria Investigacion
Deposited on: 13 Oct 2020 14:20
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2022 09:00
  • Logo InvestigaM (UPM)
  • Logo GEOUP4
  • Logo Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Logo Sherpa/Romeo
    Check whether the anglo-saxon journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo Dulcinea
    Check whether the spanish journal in which you have published an article allows you to also publish it under open access.
  • Logo de Recolecta
  • Logo del Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • Logo de OpenCourseWare UPM