Full text
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview |
López Lambas, María Eugenia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-453X and Alonso Ramos, Andrea
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-8581
(2019).
The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability.
"Sustainability", v. 11
(n. 18);
p. 4986.
ISSN 2071-1050.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184986.
Title: | The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability |
---|---|
Author/s: |
|
Item Type: | Article |
Título de Revista/Publicación: | Sustainability |
Date: | 12 September 2019 |
ISSN: | 2071-1050 |
Volume: | 11 |
Subjects: | |
Freetext Keywords: | Autonomous Vehicles, Driverless Buses, Acceptability, Focus Group, Barriers |
Faculty: | E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM) |
Department: | Ingeniería del Transporte, Territorio y Urbanismo |
Creative Commons Licenses: | Recognition - No derivative works - Non commercial |
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer, such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview |
The development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) holds a high potential for improving security, reducing congestion, increasing fuel efficiency, and saving time. Various studies conducted on the implementation of AVs predict that fully autonomous vehicles will be available for the public in the 2020s. However, it will take another three decades, at least, for these vehicles and technologies to be accepted among the general masses and become reliable and affordable for use. Nonetheless, while a great deal has been stated regarding autonomous cars, little attention has been paid to autonomous public transport, more specifically, autonomous buses (ABs). The present report analyzed the psychological barriers preventing the complete implementation of ABs through data collected from focus group (FG) discussions. The main objective of the FGs was to determine the factors influencing perceptions regarding ABs and their acceptability. The most important factors from the positive side were the reduction of personnel costs, the potential to decrease congestion, waiting time at intersections, and reduced emissions. On the other hand, the most important negative factors were an increase in vehicle and infrastructure costs, safety risks under certain conditions (e.g., system failures, terrorist attacks, etc.), and the possible reduction of employment opportunities.
Item ID: | 64444 |
---|---|
DC Identifier: | https://oa.upm.es/64444/ |
OAI Identifier: | oai:oa.upm.es:64444 |
DOI: | 10.3390/su11184986 |
Official URL: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4986 |
Deposited by: | Memoria Investigacion |
Deposited on: | 13 Oct 2020 14:20 |
Last Modified: | 30 Nov 2022 09:00 |