Farmers behaviour on mitigation and adaptation to climate change: A case study in Kenya.

García de Jalón, Silvestre; Iglesias Picazo, Ana y Barnes, Andrew (2013). Farmers behaviour on mitigation and adaptation to climate change: A case study in Kenya.. En: "SURC: Sustainable Intensification: The pathway to low carbon farming?", 25/09/2014 - 27/09/2014, Edimburgh. pp. 56-59.

Descripción

Título: Farmers behaviour on mitigation and adaptation to climate change: A case study in Kenya.
Autor/es:
  • García de Jalón, Silvestre
  • Iglesias Picazo, Ana
  • Barnes, Andrew
Tipo de Documento: Ponencia en Congreso o Jornada (Artículo)
Título del Evento: SURC: Sustainable Intensification: The pathway to low carbon farming?
Fechas del Evento: 25/09/2014 - 27/09/2014
Lugar del Evento: Edimburgh
Título del Libro: Book of Conference Proceedings: Sustainable Intensification: The pathway to low carbon farming?
Fecha: 2013
Materias:
Escuela: E.T.S.I. Agrónomos (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Departamento: Economía Agraria, Estadística y Gestión de Empresas
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (184kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

Farmers in Africa are facing climate change and challenging rural livelihoods while maintaining agricultural systems that are not resilient. By 2050 the mean estimates of production of key staple crops in Africa such as maize, sorghum, millet, groundnut, and cassava are expected to decrease by between 8 and 22 percent (Schlenker and Lobell 2010). In Kenya, although projections of rainfall do not show dramatic decreases, the distribution of impacts is clearly negative for most crops. As increases in temperature will lead to increases in evapotranspiration, a potential increase in rainfall in Kenya may not offset the expected increases in agricultural water needs (Herrero et al. 2010). In order to respond to these present and future challenges, potential mitigation and adaptation options have been developed. However, implementation is not evident. In addition to their benefits in either mitigating or reducing the vulnerability of climate change effects, many of these options do not have economic costs and even provide economic benefits (e.g. savings in the consumption of energy or natural resources). Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that even when there are no biophysical, technological or economic constraints and despite their potential benefits from either the economic or environmental climate change point of view, not all farmers are willing to adopt these measures. This reflects the key role that behavioural barriers can play in the uptake of mitigation and adaptation measures.

Más información

ID de Registro: 31114
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/31114/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:31114
URL Oficial: http://www.sruc.ac.uk/
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 09 Oct 2014 17:00
Ultima Modificación: 21 Jun 2016 08:21
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM