Texto completo
|
PDF (Portable Document Format)
- Acceso permitido solamente a usuarios en el campus de la UPM
- Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (440kB) |
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-8502, Blanco Adán, Carlos Roberto del
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-3488, Kavallieratou, Ergina and García Santos, Narciso
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-894X
(2019).
Overview of the ImageCLEFsecurity 2019: File Forgery Detection Tasks.
En: "Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2019)", 09/09/2019 - 12/09/2019, Lugano, Switzerland. pp. 1-9.
| Título: | Overview of the ImageCLEFsecurity 2019: File Forgery Detection Tasks |
|---|---|
| Autor/es: |
|
| Tipo de Documento: | Ponencia en Congreso o Jornada (Artículo) |
| Título del Evento: | Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2019) |
| Fechas del Evento: | 09/09/2019 - 12/09/2019 |
| Lugar del Evento: | Lugano, Switzerland |
| Título del Libro: | Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2019) |
| Fecha: | 2019 |
| Materias: | |
| ODS: | |
| Palabras Clave Informales: | File Forgery Detection; Digital Forensics; Forged Image; Stego Image |
| Escuela: | E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación (UPM) |
| Departamento: | Señales, Sistemas y Radiocomunicaciones |
| Licencias Creative Commons: | Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial |
|
PDF (Portable Document Format)
- Acceso permitido solamente a usuarios en el campus de la UPM
- Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (440kB) |
The File Forgery Detection tasks is in its first edition, in 2019. This year, it is composed by three subtasks: a) Forged file discovery, b) Stego image discovery and c) Secret message discovery. The data set contained 6,400 images and pdf files, divided into 3 sets. There were 61 participants and the majority of them participated in all the subtasks. This highlights the major concern the scientific community shows for security issues and the importance of each subtask. Submissions varied from a) 8, b) 31 and c) 14 submissions for each subtask, respectively. Although the datasets were small, most of the participants used deep learning techniques, especially in subtasks 2 & 3. The results obtained in subtask 3-which was the most difficult one-showed that there is room for improvement, as more advanced techniques are needed to achieve better results. Deep learning techniques adopted by many researchers is a preamble in that direction, and proved that they may provide a promising steganalysis tool to a digital forensics examiner.
| ID de Registro: | 65257 |
|---|---|
| Identificador DC: | https://oa.upm.es/65257/ |
| Identificador OAI: | oai:oa.upm.es:65257 |
| Depositado por: | Memoria Investigacion |
| Depositado el: | 24 Abr 2021 07:57 |
| Ultima Modificación: | 24 Abr 2021 07:57 |
Publicar en el Archivo Digital desde el Portal Científico