Ranking Alternatives on the Basis of the Intensity of Dominance and Fuzzy Logic within MAUT

Jiménez Martín, Antonio; Mateos Caballero, Alfonso y Sabio, Pilar (2010). Ranking Alternatives on the Basis of the Intensity of Dominance and Fuzzy Logic within MAUT. En: "Operations Research Annual Society Conference, OR52", 07/09/2010 - 09/09/2010, Londres, UK. ISBN 0-903440-47-0.

Descripción

Título: Ranking Alternatives on the Basis of the Intensity of Dominance and Fuzzy Logic within MAUT
Autor/es:
  • Jiménez Martín, Antonio
  • Mateos Caballero, Alfonso
  • Sabio, Pilar
Tipo de Documento: Ponencia en Congreso o Jornada (Artículo)
Título del Evento: Operations Research Annual Society Conference, OR52
Fechas del Evento: 07/09/2010 - 09/09/2010
Lugar del Evento: Londres, UK
Título del Libro: Proceedings of Operations Research Annual Society Conference, OR52
Fecha: 2010
ISBN: 0-903440-47-0
Materias:
Escuela: Facultad de Informática (UPM) [antigua denominación]
Departamento: Inteligencia Artificial
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - Sin obra derivada - No comercial

Texto completo

[img]
Vista Previa
PDF (Document Portable Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (479kB) | Vista Previa

Resumen

We introduce dominance measuring methods to derive a ranking of alternatives to deal with incomplete information in multi-criteria decision making problems on the basis of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). We consider the situation where the alternative performances are represented by uniformly distributed intervals, and there exists imprecision concerning the decision-makers¿ preferences, by means of classes of individual utility functions and imprecise weights represented by weight intervals or fuzzy weights, respectively. An additive multi-attribute utility model is used to evaluate the alternatives under consideration, which is considered a valid approach in most practical cases. The approaches we propose are based on the dominance values between pairs of alternatives that can be computed by linear programming, which are then transformed into dominance intensities from which a dominance intensity measure is derived. The methods proposed are compared with other existing dominance measuring methods and other methodologies by Monte Carlo simulation techniques. The performance is analyzed in terms of two measures of efficacy: hit ratio, the proportion of all cases in which the method selects the same best alternative as in the TRUE ranking, and the Rank-order correlation, which represents how similar the overall rank structures of alternatives are in the TRUE ranking and in the ranking derived from the method. The approaches are illustrated with an example consisting on the selection of intervention strategies to restore an aquatic ecosystem contaminated by radionuclides.

Más información

ID de Registro: 7598
Identificador DC: http://oa.upm.es/7598/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:7598
URL Oficial: http://www.orsoc.org.uk/orshop/(zqw0rj55iumvam5520d2qoqb)/orcontent.aspx?inc=or52_main.htm
Depositado por: Memoria Investigacion
Depositado el: 05 Jul 2011 13:02
Ultima Modificación: 20 Abr 2016 16:41
  • Open Access
  • Open Access
  • Sherpa-Romeo
    Compruebe si la revista anglosajona en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Dulcinea
    Compruebe si la revista española en la que ha publicado un artículo permite también su publicación en abierto.
  • Recolecta
  • e-ciencia
  • Observatorio I+D+i UPM
  • OpenCourseWare UPM