The accuracy of the microsoft kinect V2 sensor for human gait analysis. A different approach for comparison with the ground truth

Brunete González, Alberto ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-232X, Hernando Gutiérrez, Miguel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-0266, Rueda Ojeda, Javier ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-0055 and Navarro Cabello, Enrique ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4824-4525 (2020). The accuracy of the microsoft kinect V2 sensor for human gait analysis. A different approach for comparison with the ground truth. "Sensors", v. 20 (n. 16); pp. 1-14. ISSN 14248220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164405.

Descripción

Título: The accuracy of the microsoft kinect V2 sensor for human gait analysis. A different approach for comparison with the ground truth
Autor/es:
Tipo de Documento: Artículo
Título de Revista/Publicación: Sensors
Fecha: 2 Agosto 2020
ISSN: 14248220
Volumen: 20
Número: 16
Materias:
ODS:
Palabras Clave Informales: dynamic time warping; gait analysis; kinect sensor; Algorithms; Biomechanical Phenomena; Dynamic Time Warping; Gait; GAIT ANALYSIS; Humans; Kinect sensor; Latency; Motion Capture; Software; Walk Test
Escuela: Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte (INEF) (UPM)
Departamento: Salud y Rendimiento Humano
Licencias Creative Commons: Reconocimiento

Texto completo

[thumbnail of 7474109.pdf] PDF (Portable Document Format) - Se necesita un visor de ficheros PDF, como GSview, Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Descargar (1MB)

Resumen

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Several studies have examined the accuracy of the Kinect V2 sensor during gait analysis. Usually the data retrieved by the Kinect V2 sensor are compared with the ground truth of certified systems using a Euclidean comparison. Due to the Kinect V2 sensor latency, the application of a uniform temporal alignment is not adequate to compare the signals. On that basis, the purpose of this study was to explore the abilities of the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm to compensate for sensor latency (3 samples or 90 ms) and develop a proper accuracy estimation. During the experimental stage, six iterations were performed using the a dual Kinect V2 system. The walking tests were developed at a self-selected speed. The sensor accuracy for Euclidean matching was consistent with that reported in previous studies. After latency compensation, the sensor accuracy demonstrated considerably lower error rates for all joints. This demonstrated that the accuracy was underestimated due to the use of inappropriate comparison techniques. On the contrary, DTW is a potential method that compensates for the sensor latency, and works sufficiently in comparison with certified systems.

Proyectos asociados

Tipo
Código
Acrónimo
Responsable
Título
Gobierno de España
DPI2017-85738-R
Sin especificar
Sin especificar
Sin especificar

Más información

ID de Registro: 92482
Identificador DC: https://oa.upm.es/92482/
Identificador OAI: oai:oa.upm.es:92482
URL Portal Científico: https://portalcientifico.upm.es/es/ipublic/item/7474109
Identificador DOI: 10.3390/s20164405
URL Oficial: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/4405
Depositado por: iMarina Portal Científico
Depositado el: 21 Dic 2025 11:52
Ultima Modificación: 21 Dic 2025 11:52